Maple Student Centre - Click here to read more...
The AdeptStore: Order Technical Software 24 hours a day from anywhere in the world

Product Index
Search
Register
Products
What's New
Pressroom
Adept Store

Support
Free Seminars
Info Requests
Magazines
Tech Support
Training

Corporate
About Adept
Contact Us
Find Adept
Jobs

Maple Reporter

Introducing Maple 7

Maple at 20

Maple Student Centre

Instant Calculus

Application Centre Highlights
Animations Contest
Games in Maple
Population Biology
Is it raining in Moscow

Tips & Techniques

Maple 7 and Maple Powertools Each Win and EDDIE Award

Maple at 20

Through it all, it’s been about the maths
An interview with Keith Geddes, Co-Founder, Waterloo Maple Inc.

Dr. Keith Geddes is one of the founders of the Maple system
and on the board of directors of Waterloo Maple Inc. Dr. Geddes is a professor of Computer Science and Co-Director of the Symbolic Computation Group at the University of Waterloo. His research interests include algebraic algorithms for symbolic computation, the design of the Maple computer algebra system and exploring the symbolic-numeric interface in scientific computing.

How did Maple come about?
In the autumn of 1980, I called a meeting of various Computer Science faculty members at the University of Waterloo to discuss the idea of how we could get a machine that was sufficient to run a system like MACSYMA (at the time, it only ran on a DEC 10 with a great deal of memory). My colleagues told me to forget the Lisp-based systems and develop a system of our own using modern implementation languages.

Initially, Maple was implemented in B on a Honeywell computer, but soon afterward, C became the obvious widely available language. In 1981, we moved from the Honeywell to a Vax 780. We purchased our first UNIX box for Maple in 1983 for $25,000, a Spectrix computer with one megabyte of memory.

It was at this meeting, in November 1980, that the Maple system was conceived. The primary goal was to design a computer algebra system that would be accessible to large numbers of researchers in mathematics, engineering and science, and to large numbers of students for educational purposes. One of the key ideas was to make space efficiency, as well as time efficiency fundamental criteria. As well, another aspect of making the system accessible was portability, so that the system could be ported to the various microcomputers that were appearing in the marketplace.

By the first week in December 1980, we had an operational Maple system, and it evolved from there. In trying to name the system, we started thinking of an acronym. When I suggested the name "Maple," we decided we would go with that, as it seemed like a good Canadian name (not an acronym).

What was the first problem Maple ever solved?
One of the first problems Maple ever solved was one by a Ph.D. thesis student concerning the performance analysis of data structures. Before Maple, such asymptotic analysis would have been done using simulations and running problem sets over and over again.

When was Maple first distributed to other users?
By January of 1981, we started using Maple in at least one maths course at the university, "Introduction to Symbolic Computation," a course on algebraic algorithms for senior undergraduate and graduate students. Several local mathematicians started to use the system in 1982 in their research.

Starting in 1982, demonstrations of the system were presented at various conferences around the world. Maple was first distributed (at a nominal charge of $250) to colleagues who asked for a tape of the system. By 1983, researchers at various institutions were using the software in various disciplines including mathematics, computer science, engineering, physics and economics. At the end of 1983, there were about 50 external installations of the software.

The impact on our research lab of having "customers" inquiring about software availability, requesting ports to different operating systems and requesting support became significant. It was clear that the issue of software distribution and, more significantly, support had to be addressed.

In 1984, we made arrangements with Watcom Products Inc. to license and distribute the Maple software. Towards this end, we enhanced the system's general mathematical capabilities in certain areas, we ported it from its UNIX base to the IBM VM/CMS system and the DEC VMS system and reworked the existing Reference Manual into an acceptable User's Guide. Achieving these goals caused about a one-year delay in getting the product ready for distribution, which finally started about mid-1985. By 1987, there were about 300 installations worldwide.
In April of 1988, we incorporated Waterloo Maple Software (now Waterloo Maple Inc.) for the purpose of marketing, distributing and supporting the software. During 1988-1990, the installed base grew to about 2000 installations worldwide.

What was your vision for Maple when it was first developed?
Until 1990 or so, it was never about making a commercially successful product. Our vision was about creating a powerful system for symbolic mathematics. With each new release, we wanted to do more and more powerful maths.

What is your vision for Maple today?
Twenty years later, our original vision and intent for the product remains: consistently develop a more powerful system with which to do maths. But part of this vision now includes evolving the system so that more people (especially undergraduate students) can use Maple with ease.

Looking back at the history of Maple, what were some of the best long-term decisions the founders made?
Probably the best move we made was right in the beginning when we decided to make space efficiency as well as time efficiency fundamental criteria of the system. More recently, I think that the decision to create and manage the Maple Application Centre was a very good decision. This demonstrates our commitment to the second part of our vision: making it easy for more people to use Maple.

Were any dubious decisions made?
Unfortunately, I think we didn’t consider commercialising Maple soon enough; that is, we should have considered the user-interface, graphics and other bells and whistles earlier than we did. For us, it had always been about the maths. But then, this too has served us well.

Article: Maple at 20